BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//PeaceRep - ECPv6.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:PeaceRep
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://peacerep.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for PeaceRep
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20220101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230302T180000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230302T193000
DTSTAMP:20230303T101008Z
CREATED:20230227T152641Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230303T101008Z
UID:19519-1677780000-1677785400@peacerep.org
SUMMARY:The Politics of the Turkey/Syria Earthquake: Responses & Aftermath
DESCRIPTION:Panel discussion hosted by LSE Human Rights\, LSE IDEAS and LSE Middle East Centre \nWhen: Thursday 2 March 2023\, 18:00 – 19:30 GMT\nWhere: Sheikh Zayed Lecture Theatre\, New Academic Building\, LSE\, 54 Lincoln’s Inn Fields\, London\, WC2A 3LJ \n\n\n\n\n\n\nRSVP via Eventbrite\n\n\n\n— \nThe recent earthquakes in Turkey and Syria have had catastrophic impacts across a large area. More than 44\,000 people have died and hundreds of thousands have been left homeless\, with key infrastructure heavily damaged. Many of those affected are refugee communities already traumatised by conflict. The magnitude and urgency of the humanitarian challenge requires critical reflection and discussion on the responses to the earthquakes from states\, international organisations and NGOs. To what extent have emergency agencies been able to access and deliver relief to those most in need? What are the conditions\, and prospects for\, recovery and reconstruction? The panel at this event will consider these and other questions. \nChair: Dr Ayça Çubukçu – Associate Professor in Human Rights and Co-Director of LSE Human Rights at LSE \nSpeakers: \nDr Karabekir Akkoyunlu – Lecturer in the Politics of the Middle East\, Department of Politics and International Studies\, SOAS \nDr Hişyar Özsoy – Member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) for the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) \nDr Rim Turkmani – Research Director of the Syria Research Programme\, Conflict & Civicness Research Group\, LSE IDEAS \nAmberin Zaman – Senior Correspondent for Al-Monitor \n— \nThe event is free but those attending are invited to donate to fundraisers: \n\nDisasters Emergency Committee\nSyrian British Consortium\n\n— \nRSVP via Eventbrite\n 
URL:https://peacerep.org/event/politics-of-turkey-syria-earthquake-lse/
LOCATION:London
CATEGORIES:Public Event
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://peacerep.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/GettyImages-1467659120.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230308T100000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230308T110000
DTSTAMP:20230308T103115Z
CREATED:20230227T152422Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230308T103115Z
UID:19590-1678269600-1678273200@peacerep.org
SUMMARY:Research Seminar: The peace process as a quantitative unit of analysis
DESCRIPTION:Visiting researcher Yoav Kapshuk (Kinneret College on the Sea of Galilee) presents findings from a recent paper co-authored with Yuval Haitman (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev): \nThe peace process as a quantitative unit of analysis\nPlease RSVP via Eventbrite to attend\nPaper Abstract: \nPrevious quantitative research has examined both the design of peace agreements and assessed which provisions characterize stable ones. However\, research on peace agreements as a single unit of analysis misses the connections forged between multiple agreements within a peace process. \nTherefore\, while recognizing the difficulties in operationally defining the concept of peace process\, this project restructures the data from PA-X peace agreements database (version 5) such that the unit of analysis is the peace process instead of the peace agreement. In doing so\, we obtain insight into the principles at work when designing peace processes. To this end\, we use machine learning methods to assess at what stage and in what order within a negotiation is it desirable to engage in any given principle. \nA preliminary examination was conducted on the principles of transitional justice (TJ)\, an area known to be significant for societies transitioning from conflict to peace. We examined which principles of TJ in partial agreements predict the achievement of a comprehensive agreement and found that out of 10 variables of TJ from the PA-X database\, the presence of 1) reconciliation\, 2) release of prisoners and 3) mechanisms to deal with the past in intermediate stages of peace processes (i.e.\, in partial agreements) have the greatest contribution to achieving comprehensive agreements. In contrast\, provisions such as vetting\, missing\, and courts in intermediate stages of peace processes have the lowest contribution to achieving comprehensive agreements; provisions such as amnesty and reparation have medium contribution. \nThese findings advance our understanding of what key TJ provisions to focus on during negotiations. Future research will use observations of peace processes to examine the importance of other principles: inclusion of groups (such as minorities\, women\, refugees)\, provisions for security\, provisions for power-sharing\, and more.  \nPlease RSVP via Eventbrite to attend
URL:https://peacerep.org/event/research-seminar-peace-process-quantitative-analysis/
LOCATION:University of Edinburgh
CATEGORIES:Featured,Public Event
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://peacerep.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/GettyImages-1436732861.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230330
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20230401
DTSTAMP:20230127T165705Z
CREATED:20230119T115552Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230127T165705Z
UID:19261-1680134400-1680307199@peacerep.org
SUMMARY:Conference - Rethinking Sovereignty at the Radical Frontier: Pirates\, Proxies and Post-State Philosophies
DESCRIPTION:Rethinking Sovereignty at the Radical Frontier: Pirates\, Proxies and Post-State Philosophies\nConference hosted by the Centre for Trust\, Peace and Social Relations at Coventry University \nLocation: Coventry University\, Cheetah Rd\, Coventry CV1 2TL \nDeadline for abstracts and registrations: 25 January 2023 \nComplete this form to submit and abstract\, or to register to attend \nThe war of aggression raging in Eastern Europe is a stark reminder of the fragility of sovereignty itself\, and the real threats faced by many nations. Threats to the sanctity of state sovereignty\, and the global liberal order of international relations which sits precariously upon it\, come from all directions and domains\, whether by land\, air\, sea\, cyberspace\, urban concrete space\, or the vacuum of outer space. The system of international relations\, based upon the Westphalian and later UN concept of sovereign equality between states is tenuous and fragile\, and recent international relations have shown that its very foundations can be threatened at any time. The reality of the postliberal international order increasingly appears as an enduring radical frontier\, where pirates\, hackers and criminals roam\, proxy wars and enduring transitions in fragmented contexts challenge and muddy the black and white ideals that liberal internationalism was based upon. Everywhere citizens and states increasingly seem to operate by a post-state philosophy based more on the exception than the rule. \nThis conference seeks to examine these challenges to sovereignty at the frontiers of the state\, in three directions:\n1. Threats from the radical fringe of pirates\, proxies\, hackers\, and terrorists who openly challenge and threaten state security; and\n2. Perspectives of enduring transitions evolving in increasingly ‘ungoverned’\, non-closed and permanently changing modalities.\n3. On the other side of the spectrum\,squatters\, activists and alternative movements offer radically alternate visions of ‘a good life’\, and new embodiments of the idea of sovereignty that allows it. \nBy opening this conversation\, we can re-examine the foundations of sovereignty itself\, and ask a raft of pressing questions: what is sovereignty? Where did it come from? How can it be claimed or asserted? And\, perhaps most important of all\, are there any viable alternatives to the current\, deeply flawed system\, be it at the extra-national\, international\, the national or the local level. In approaching this daunting task – a deep reappraisal of the Westphalian foundations of global order – we may seek guidance from philosophers past and present\, from Kant to Nietzsche to Foucault\, and other contemporary thinkers\, and ask what relief and direction they can offer in deeply troubling times. \nWe are seeking papers willing to engage in a ‘festival of dangerous ideas’ – a deep critique of lip-service sovereignty\, a willingness to ‘stare into the abyss’ and call out the contemporary realities of sovereignty\, as well as a brave offering of alternate visions and ideas of how real existing sovereignty could and might be conceptualised. \nPotential Panels\n• Emerging and future threats to sovereignty in the era of cyberwarfare\, artificial intelligence and security in the new online frontier\n• Maritime security and encroaching threats to the living ecosystems existing within sovereign maritime territorial spaces\n• Alternative approaches to sovereignty: Micro-Sovereignties (example: seasteads\, squatted buildings\, autonomous zones\, safe spaces\, etc.\,) and pragmatic approaches\, such as civic-ness\n• Proxy wars\, state-sponsored aggression and the role of non-state actors\n• Transitional arrangements in fragment states\, (aka states that have never existed as a sovereign entity with unified governance)\n• Decolonialism and indigenous sovereignty\n• Structures of international relations\, the United Nations as an institution\, the UN Security Council\, and ideas for reform\n• Philosophical approaches to sovereignty more broadly\nApplications for other panels or papers are also encouraged. Organisers plan to submit a special edition of a leading journal on the theme of Sovereignty at the Radical Frontier.\nWe seek submissions in two formats:\n1. Written abstracts of up to 500 words\n2. Artistic interventions that address this theme\, which might include original artworks\, graphic novels and comics\, or poster presentations.\nTraditional academic panels are planned alongside an artistic ‘gallery of dangerous ideas’\, and will take place in person at the Centre for Trust\, Peace and Social Relations in Coventry. \nDeadline for abstracts and registrations: 25 January 2023 \nComplete this form to submit and abstract\, or to register to attend \nFunded Travel\nPlease advise at time of application if you would like to be considered for funding. Instructions on how to book funded travel via CTPSR will be sent separately. \nKeynote\nProf Mary Kaldor\, Professor of Global Governance at the London School of Economics\nCities at War: Global Insecurity and Urban Resistance (Edited volume\, 2020) \nThis project has received funding from: \n\nThe European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 101029232\, and\nThe Peace and Conflict Resolution Evidence Platform (PeaceRep)\, funded by the UK Foreign\, Commonwealth and Development Office.
URL:https://peacerep.org/event/conference-rethinking-sovereignty-at-the-radical-frontier/
CATEGORIES:Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://peacerep.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Radical-Frontier-Call-for-Papers.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR